What Does an Architect Actually do On Site
- Edward Acres
- Oct 16
- 3 min read
You’ve seen the drawings.
The builder’s ready to go.
So why is your architect still involved?
What exactly are they doing during construction?
In this blog, I’m going to break down exactly what an architect does on site — and why removing them at this stage is one of the biggest (and most expensive) mistakes you can make.
The Biggest Mis-Conception
Most people think once the builder’s on site, the architect becomes… what?
A stylist?
An optional observer?
Or just there to answer questions?
Not even close.
Here’s the truth:
If you’ve appointed an architect for Contract Administration or Construction Stage Services, then they’re not just a bystander — they’re the client’s primary line of defence.
Key Construction Stage Roles
🧾 1. Contract Administrator
If you’re using a JCT (or similar) contract, someone needs to administer the contract fairly and independently.
That means:
Certifying payments
Issuing instructions
Assessing extensions of time
Managing variations
Reviewing claims
Without this, the contractor becomes the referee — and you’re always on the back foot.
🏗 2. Design Guardian
Architects make sure that what’s being built:
Matches the drawings
Uses the correct materials
Complies with regulations and approvals
Meets performance expectations
If the builder substitutes or changes something — and no one spots it — you may not find out until it's far too late.
📐 3. Detail Resolver
Even the best drawings can't predict every real-world condition.
Architects on site:
Issue clarifications
Sketch junctions
Resolve buildability conflicts
Prevent delays by quickly solving unknowns
Without the architect, the builder either stops the job… or guesses. Neither is good.
📅 4. Programme Watchdog
Architects hold the contractor accountable to milestones — especially for:
Key design approvals
Material ordering
Inspections and tests
Practical Completion
We keep your build on track, not just on site.
🔍 5. Quality Control Partner
Yes — the builder builds.
But the architect:
Attends regular site inspections
Reviews workmanship
Reports defects
Flags non-compliant work early
This avoids “you should have said something earlier” at handover.
📞 6. Client Liaison
Clients — especially homeowners — get nervous during construction.
The architect helps translate what’s happening on site, explains what’s next, and avoids reactionary decision-making under stress.
They’re a stabiliser — especially when things get unpredictable.
🛡 7. Risk Reducer
In simple terms:
Less guesswork
Fewer disputes
Clearer communication
Reduced cost creep
The cost of one missed compliance issue could be thousands.
The architect is there to spot it before it becomes a problem.
What Happens without them
So what if you don’t have your architect involved on site?
Here’s what we typically see:
Contractor self-certifies or under-communicates
Substitutions made without approval
Quality diluted to hit programme
Disputes arise with no independent referee
Client ends up paying to fix issues post-completion
And you ask: “How did this happen?
”Simple: no one was watching the detail.
So to sum up...
If you're thinking of cutting architect involvement after planning — stop.
It’s a false saving, and a risky one.
Want to know what level of involvement you need?
Download the free guide below:📥 “What Your Architect Should Do During Construction”
It breaks down the different service levels, what you get at each, and what to expect in terms of cost, site visits, and accountability.
🎥 And in the next blog:
“Planning Conditions: The Silent Project Killer”
We’ll uncover why planning conditions — not the permission — can bring your project to a halt.



Comments